International
Journal of Zoology and Applied Biosciences |
ISSN: 2455-9571 |
|
Volume 3, Issue 4, pp: 283-288, 2018 |
|
|
Research Article |
|
|
CENSUS STUDY ON BLACK BUCKS ANTILOPE CERVICAPRA
(L). IN HULLATHI SECTION OF RANEBENNUR
WILDLIFE SANCTUARY (RWLS), RANEBENNUR, HAVERI DISTRICT, KARNATAKA M.D. Mamatha* and B.B. Hosetti *1Department of Post Graduate
Studies and Research in Applied Zoology, Kuvempu University, Jnana
Sahyadri, Shankaraghatta,
Shivamogga, Karnataka, India |
|
|
Article History: Received 30th
May 2018; Accepted; 26th June 2018 Published 15th July
2018 |
|
|
Ranebennur Black Buck Sanctuary is located in Ranebennur
Taluk of Haveri District,
Karnataka, established for protection of Black bucks and other fauna and
flora. The sanctuary is declared vide Government of Karnataka Notification No.AFD-58-PWL-74 dated
17-6-1974 with an area of 119Sq.Km. The Black buck Antilope cervicapra
(Linnaeus, 1758) is a member of group of Bovidae
native to India. The forest area of this Sanctuary is classified as
''Southern Thorn Forest' as per Champion and Seth's classification in the
year (1968), habitats of the sanctuary include scrub, dry deciduous and
grassland type with sparse tree vegetation. In India (1982) the estimated
populations of blackbucks range from 22,500 to 24,500, as per India Portal
Report at the time of independence. The black buck population was estimated
to be 80,000 presently; this species is declining in number all over its
range in the country. During the field study, populations of black bucks are
evaluated and any variation is discussed in this paper. The sanctuary is
divided into Four Sections Viz Hullathi,
Huniskatti, Hanumapura,
and Alalgere. In Hullathi
section the study area is divided into Hullathi, Kudrihala, Medleri beats. The
sampling was made once on every
month for a period of 1 year starting from June 2017 to May 2017 to know the
variation in blackbuck density. About 1519 animals were cited in present
study area. This Paper highlights the variation in black buck populations and
discussed on conservation strategies for them. |
|
INTRODUCTION
The Antilope cervicapra (L) is an ungulate species
commonly called as Black buck. A most handsome of all Asiatic antelopes and
member of Bovidae family are locally known as Krishna
mryga or Chegare. A. cervicapra is
one of the Key species of the grassland ecosystem. The Black buck is the only
living species of the genus Antilope (Nowak, 1999). Its generic name stems from the
Latin word Antelopus, a horned animal. The specific
name cervicapra
is composed of the Latin words capra, she goat and cervus, deer.
The genus Antilope is only representative
found in India and one of the most graceful and the fastest runner of all surviving
species (70 Km/hr) (Mahato & Raziuddin, 2010). A. cervicapra (Linnaeus, 1758) is a group
living animal native to India (Shambhulingappa et
al., 2014). The conservation status of Black
buck is listed in Red Data Book of IUCN
(International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural resources) as
Vulnerable, under CITES (Convention on International trade for Endangered species of Wild flora and fauna). It is categorized
in Appendix III and Schedule I of Wildlife (Protection) Act 1972.
Blackbuck and Great Indian Bustard
are the theme species to Ranebennur blackbuck
sanctuary. Black bucks are now limited to a few areas, like parts of Rajasthan
and Gujarat where it is protected by religious sentiments. Great Indian bustard
were not cited for the past few years due to change in habitat condition from
Grassy to Woodland, GIB were reported till 1982 and
disappeared then onwards or migrated towards arid lands of Bellary area. The
other fauna and flora found in the sanctuary are distributed due to immense
pressure of large scale poaching and destruction of their habitat including cultivation,
cattle grazing, human habitation etc.
The Black bucks are also situated in few isolated pockets of
Karnataka. Those studies include Tumkur-based
Wildlife Aware Nature Club (WANC) conducted studies
and initiated actions to declare a habitat in Tumkur as
Jayamangali Blackbuck Conservation Reserve (Kumar & Zutshi, 2013) Melkote
wildlife sanctuary which is also house for blackbucks. Due to intensive
management and Protection of the area at Ranebennur,
resulted in increase in Black buck’s population year after year (Singh et al.,
2011).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study area
Ranebennur blackbuck
sanctuary is situated towards north-east of Pune-Bangalore
National Highway No 4 at North east of Ranebennur. It
is situated between 14°-34-00’’ to
14°- 0-46 -00’’ latitude North and between 75°-30-08’’ to75°-47-21’’longitude East. The topography of the Study area
ranging from 531M to 762M
above MSL and Temperature varies from 25°C in winter to, 40°C in the summer.
March-April is the hottest months. Average rainfall is around 600-620 mm. The
soil structure is ''Gneisses'' Shisty and Granite of Archean area and Deccan trap rocks of tertiary era, since area
coming under Tungabhadra River Valley Project (RVP).
The area of the Sanctuary is 119 Sq.kms. It is spread over in four sections
those include, Hullathi, Huniskatti,
Hanumapura, and Alalgere.
Among these areas Hullathi and Huniskatti
form a contiguous block and Hanumapura and Alalgeri are isolated. An area of 14.87 Sq.kms in Hullathi Block has been notified as ''CORE AREA’’ on 21-10-1982
from the (Table 1).
LINE TRANSECTS METHOD
Transect
is a path along which one will enumerate and record the species. Line transects
techniques for estimating animal density through direct counts is popular.
Transects were placed in Hullathi Section, and it consists
three beats namely Hullathi, Medleri,
Kudrihala. For each beat 2 Km Transect line has been placed.
To estimate
the population size or density of an animal in area is a fundamental requirement
to understand its status and demography and to plan for its management and
conservation. In spite of the development of sophisticated stastical
methods of sampling of animal species (Burnham et al.,
1980), both direct and indirect methods
of estimating mammals densities in forest have been used (Barnes & Jensen, 1987; Karanth & Sunquist, 1992; Koster & Hart, 1988; Sale
et al., 1990; Varman et al.,
1995). Estimates based on indirect
methods usually involve counting animal droppings, while direct methods use
visual sightings .Line transect sampling is practical, efficient and relatively
inexpensive for many biological population (Anderson, Laake, Crain, & Burnham, 1979; Burnham et al.,
1980).
The surveyed for blackbucks and other animal was undertaken in
Ranebennur Wildlife Sanctuary. Transect is made for
blackbucks and other animals. Transect is made for each beat for a length of 2 Kms. The assistance
of trained forest department watchers is sought in the census activity, the main aim was to count
the Black bucks and to know the present Population density.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
The study in Hullathi, Kudrihala and Medleri beat
revealed the total sightings of 1112
total animals in all the three beats of Ranebennur Black
buck sanctuary. From the above three beats total transect length of 6 Kms, 203 Male adult, 657 Female adult, 126 Young males, 126
Young females and animals were
sighted in 14.87 Sq.kms area in the Hullathi
section of Ranebennur Black buck sanctuary (Table 2).
During the study period the animal
numbers varied month wise .The present study revealed more number of Black
bucks from (June to January) may be because, it was rainy and winter season, there
was abundance of food and the habitat condition also congenial. Gradual decline in the number of density of
Black bucks in the months (February to May) may be due to scarcity of food and water, during
hot months and hence there was a less citation of animals. The period June to May revealed 1519 black bucks
citations which includes a maximum numbers of animals, male adult n=190
(12.50%), female adult n=894 (58.85%).young male n=181 (11.91%), young female
n=254 (16.72%) recorded respectively (Figure 1, 2, 3 and 4). Based on the study
highest population was observed 335 Black bucks found in Hullathi
Section from the (Table 3 and 4).
In the sanctuary
area availability of food was abundant with artificial feeding grounds and
waterholes in the sanctuary which was made by the Forest Department. Protection
is improved and Poaching or hunting of Wild animals has come down as per the
records available at range level. Sighting of animals and its population is
increased as noticed in field visits. Hullathi
section is chosen as a part of Core area and included in Tourism zone to sight
the animal.
Table 1.
Details about Hullathi
section of Ranebennur Wildlife Sanctuary (RWLS).
|
Hullathi
section |
Hullathi |
Kudrihala |
Medleri |
|
Forest
Division Forest
Range Route
No Date Starting
Time Finishing
Time Elevation Longitude Latitude
Vegetation Types (In
Percentage) Grassland Scrub Plantation Others
(Specify) Transect length
in Meters |
WL
Sub-Division, Ranebennur. Ranebennur
WL Range. 01 25/05/2017 6.00
am 8.00
am 488.62
m-488.27 m E- 075⁰
39’ 58.24’’ N- 14⁰ 38’
58.05’’ E - 075⁰
39’ 58.24’’ N - 14⁰
38’ 58.05’’ Scrub
Forest
30% 65% Nil 5%
(Eucalyptus Trees) 2000 m |
WL
Sub-Division, Ranebennur. Ranebennur
WL Range. 02 26/05/2017 6.00
am 8.15
am 546
m-546 m N
- 14⁰ 41’
22.22’’ E- 75⁰ 40’
04.29’’ N- 14⁰ 41’
13.45’’ E- 75⁰ 40’
51.17’’ Scrub
Forest Nil 85% 15% Nil
2000 m |
WL
Sub-Division, Ranebennur. Ranebennur
WL Range 03 27/05/2017 6.00
am 8.20
am 532
m-532 m N
- 14⁰
39’ 09.20’’ E- 75⁰ 41’
43.07’’ N- 14⁰
40’ 19.38’’ E
- 75⁰
41’ 47.59’’ Scrub
Forest 5% 85% 10% Nil
2000
m |
Table
2. Estimation of Total Number of Black
bucks found in Hullathi Section of Ranebennur Wildlife Sanctuary (RWLS)
by Line Transect Method.
|
Hullathi
Section |
No.
of Transect |
Total
length of Transect |
Mean
distance of sighted (In Km) |
Animal
Sighted |
Density
per Sq. Km |
||||
|
Male
Adult |
Female
Adult |
Young |
Total |
||||||
|
Male |
Total |
||||||||
|
Hullatti,
Kudrihala, Medleri |
3 |
06
Km |
0.098 |
16 |
52 |
10 |
10 |
88 |
74.829 |
Male 203
Density = n
Female 657 l X 2 X (x)
Young
once 252
Where: n- Animals
Total 1112 I – Transect length
(x)- Perpendicular
Table
3. Monthly citations of black bucks in Hullathi section Ranebennur black
buck sanctuary.
|
Months |
Male |
Percentage of male |
Female |
Percentage of female |
Young Male |
Percentage of young male |
Young Female |
Percentage of young male |
Total |
|
June |
24 |
9.30% |
190 |
73.64% |
20 |
7.75% |
24 |
9.30% |
258 |
|
July |
40 |
12.50% |
175 |
54.68% |
40 |
12.50% |
65 |
20.31% |
320 |
|
August |
38 |
15.70% |
140 |
57.85% |
29 |
11.98% |
35 |
14.46% |
242 |
|
September |
16 |
12.69% |
80 |
63.49% |
20 |
7.93% |
20 |
15.87% |
126 |
|
October |
12 |
10.16% |
65 |
55.08% |
19 |
16.10% |
22 |
18.64% |
118 |
|
November |
10 |
12.19% |
45 |
54.87% |
11 |
13.41% |
16 |
19.51% |
82 |
|
December |
16 |
20.25% |
30 |
37.97% |
15 |
18.98% |
18 |
22.78% |
79 |
|
January |
10 |
13.69% |
40 |
54.79% |
9 |
12.32% |
14 |
19.17% |
73 |
|
February |
6 |
10.71% |
41 |
73.21% |
5 |
8.92% |
4 |
7.14% |
56 |
|
March |
9 |
16.98% |
36 |
67.92% |
- |
- |
8 |
15.09% |
53 |
|
April |
5 |
9.80% |
22 |
43.13% |
14 |
27.45% |
10 |
19.60% |
51 |
|
May |
4 |
6.55% |
30 |
49.18% |
9 |
14.75% |
18 |
29.50% |
61 |
|
Total |
190 |
12.50% |
894 |
58.85% |
181 |
11.91% |
254 |
16.72% |
1519 |
Figure 1. Total No of Males and its
Percentage.
Figure 2. Total No of
Females and its Percentage.
Figure 3. Total No of Young males and its
Percentage.
Figure 4. Total No of
Young Females and its Percentage.
Table 4. Total Black buck Population in Hullathi Section
of Ranebennur Black buck Sanctuary.
|
Animals |
Numbers |
|
Male |
190 |
|
Female |
40 |
|
Young male |
65 |
|
Young female |
40 |
|
Total |
335 |
CONCLUSION
Based
on the hitherto study on Ranebennur Black buck
Sanctuary it revealed that there is a
need of more protection in terms of habitat and the key species conservation. Black bucks are one of the key species in the sanctuary
slightly increasing year after year; the original forest of this area was
classified as Southern thorn forest. The forest cover is very less and of
stunted growth, only thorny bushes and artificially planted Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus citriadra),
Neem (Azadirachta indica), Jali (Acacia nilotica) and other fruit plants etc., were present in the forest,
and grasses like Cenchrus Species and Stylozanthus species occupied as the ground cover. But due to scarcity of food,
disturbance of human settlement around the sanctuary made them to move to the
adjacent areas in search of food and shelter. Great Indian Bustard is another
important key species of the areas which is not sighted since 1998 onwards may
be due to habitat loss. Restoration of blackbuck habitat and creating
artificial feeding grounds and waterholes in the sanctuary fodder crops like Hurule (Macrotyloma uniflorum), Navani (Setaria italica), Bajra (Pennisetum glaucum), and Hemata (Stylosanthes hamata) etc
may improve conditions of the sanctuary. The major portion of the sanctuary is
covered with Eucalyptus plantation, which is of no use for fodder purpose for
black buck and GIB as well. Hence it is to be replaced
by other fruit and fodder species .Sanctuary is the only forest area available
to meet the diverse needs for local population. So people should need to gain the
confidence about awareness and importance of wild life conservation. Now a
day’s crop raiding is becoming major problem for local public, it leads to
human-animal conflict in the area. So strictly electric fencing needs to be
placed around the sanctuary.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The
authors are thankful to the Department of Wildlife, Govt. of Karnataka for
Sanctioning permission to work on Black bucks in Ranebennur
Wildlife Sanctuary and to the authorities of Dept. of Applied Zoology, Kuvempu University, and Shankarghatta
for availing a fellowship to Mamatha. M. D.
REFERENCES
Champion, H.G., & Seth,
S.K. (1968). A
Revised Survey of Forest Types of India. Govt.of India Press, New Delhi, p.
404.
Nowak, R. (1999). Tapirs. Walker's Mammals of the World,
1025-1028.