International
Journal of Zoology and Applied Biosciences |
ISSN: 2455-9571 |
|
Volume 3, Issue 3, pp: 356-461, 2018 |
|
|
Research Article |
|
|
SEASONAL
VARIATION OF WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS AND ZOOPLANKTON DIVERSITY IN WATER
BODIES OF PURULIA DISTRICT, WEST BENGAL, INDIA Ankita Pradhan1*
and Nachiketa
Bandyopadhyay2 1* Department of Aquaculture Management
and Technology, Vidyasagar University, West Bengal,
India. 2Sidho
Kanho Birsha University, Purulia, West Bengal, India |
|
|
Article History: Received 9th
April 2018; Accepted 22nd May 2018; Published 13th June
2018 |
|
|
The present
study was conducted to know the seasonal variation of water quality
parameters and also the seasonal
diversity of zooplankton in the water bodies of Purulia
District, West Bengal during the period March 2014 to February 2015. Water Temperature,
Alkalinity and Hardness showed the highest value in Pre-monsoon season.
Transparency was highest in Post Monsoon. Dissolve oxygen, Nitrate Nitrogen,
Nitrite Nitrogen and Ortho-Phosphate showed the highest value in Monsoon. Five major groups like Rotifera, Copepoda, Protozoea, Ostracoda, Cladocera represented the
zooplankton population of the studied water bodies. Rotifera,
Copepoda, Ostracoda, Cladocera showed higher population density in Pre-monsoon
season. The highest concentration of Protozoan was observed during Post
Monsoon months. |
|
INTRODUCTION
Purulia is the
western-most district of West Bengal. It has some unique characteristics of its
tropical location, its shape as well as function like a funnel. The district
has huge inland fishery resources in the form of pond, tank, and big water bodies mainly in the form of bandhs and reservoir. Maximum water area under Purulia district is semi
derelict in nature. Most of these water bodies are good source of Aquaculture. Plankton is the most important component of trophic structure which takes
parts in transfer of energy to higher trophic levels in the aquatic
environment. Zooplankton transforms plant material into animal. According to Basawarajeshwari & Ramakrishna Reddy, (2015) seasonal changes in zooplankton
species are related to the Physico-chemical parameters
of aquatic
ecosystem. Zooplanktons play an integral role
and may serve as bio indicator and it is
a well-suited tool for understanding water pollution status (Contreras
et al., 2009).
Water is the key ingredient required for the survival of all organisms in the
earth. Water used as a medium in most the
biochemical process.
A large number of aquatic organisms from microscopic plankton to large aquatic
animals dwell in Water bodies. Plankton can also
act as biomarker for water quality
assessment for fish production. Present
study was conducted to understand the seasonal variation of physico chemical characteristics of pond water
and also seasonal fluctuation of zooplankton diversity. In this study we also investigate the seasonal
diversity of different zooplankton group and their co relation with different physico-chemical parameter of water body.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
For the present
investigation 60 no’s of randomly
selected respondent (pond) has been surveyed from 12 Fishery village of 6 Administrative
Blocks and three Sub Divisions of Purulia district
west Bengal during March 2014 to February 2015.
Water sample collection
For water quality analysis random
samples of water were collected from each selected ponds of the Purulia district in the morning of each season (Pre
Monsoon, Monsoon, Post Monsoon and Winter) throughout
the research period. Water samples were collected from 50 cm depth in each
sampling station. During collection of water samples, cautions were taken so as
to prevent air bubbling, which might influence water quality parameters such as
dissolved oxygen.
Plankton sample
Plankton net
made up of silk cloth (no. 21 with 65 meshes per centimeter square) was used to collect the plankton sample. About 50 liters
of water was filtered through hand plankton net, where in the plankton concentrate used to accumulate in the
specimen tube of 100 ml fitted at the tail end of the net. The filtered sample
of plankton was preserved in 4% formalin solution and stored in labeled vials for subsequent quantitative and
qualitative analysis (APH, 2012). Zooplankton
counting was done by Sezedwick Rafter Cell counting
method. The detailed study of the
plankton was done by using OLYMPUS inverted stereoscopic microscope (Model MLX – B) fitted with a NIKON camera. Identification of
plankton was done according to the character mentioned by different authors (Battish, 1992;
Cox, 1996;
Hutchinson, 1966;
India & Biswas, 1915;
Needham & Needham, 1938;
Round, 1984;
Ward & Whipple, 1918;
Wetzel & Likens, 1991).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The seasonal variation of physico-chemical parameter of selected water
bodies of Purulia district are given below in (Table 1).
Temperature is one of the most
important and noteworthy phenomena of aquatic environment; it has the
relationship on zooplankton variation. During the study period, the mean
water temperatures varied from minimum 17.190C
in winter season and maximum 28.06℃
in Pre Monsoon months (Table 1). This
result has been supported by the finding of (Singh & Gupta, 2004; Sen et al., 2011) and (Anukool & Shivani, 2011). The average pH
value of the water bodies of the Purulia District
during the study period varies from minimum 6.93 in winter season to maximum 7.45 in pre
monsoon month. In the present investigation
the average pH ranges between 6.93-7.45 (Table 1) shows near neutral to slightly alkaline condition of the pond water
body. Higher value of pH in summer season
may be due to low water level in the pond
and high photosynthesis of
micro and macro organism resulting in high production of carbon dioxide which make the water little alkaline (Shiddamallayya & Pratima, 2011;
Trivedy, 1989).
Table 1. Seasonal
variation of different water quality parameters in the ponds of Purulia district.
|
Season |
Pre Monsoon |
Monsoon |
Post Monsoon |
Winter |
|
Parameter |
Mean ± S.D |
Mean ± S.D |
Mean ± S.D |
Mean ± S.D |
|
Water Temp |
28.066
± 0.974 |
24.813
± 0.618 |
20.963
± 2.41 |
17.19
±1.146 |
|
pH |
7.45
± 0.273 |
7.35
± 0.273 |
7
± 0.236 |
6.933
± 0.242 |
|
Transparency (Cm) |
26.693
± 0.621 |
22.955
+ 3.011 |
34.511
± 1.704 |
25.203
± 2.06 |
|
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/lt) |
3.833
± 0.30 |
4.5
±0.2 |
4.133
± 0.258 |
4.133
± 0.265 |
|
Alkalinity (mg/lt) |
65.366
± 6.03 |
59.54
±16.222 |
60.235
± 8.44 |
63.051
±14.53 |
|
Hardness (mg/lt) |
103.478
± 21.09 |
99.2
± 28.05 |
86.415
± 15.49 |
90.27
±22.15 |
|
Nitrite Nitrogen (NO2N) (mg/lt) |
0.0101
± 0.006 |
0.0172
± 0.02 |
0.0148
±0.018 |
0.0142
± 0.018 |
|
Nitrate Nitrogen (NO3N) (mg/lt) |
0.0154
± 0.003 |
0.0350
± 0.05 |
0.0134
± 0.008 |
0.0108
± 0.005 |
|
Ortho Phosphate (P2O5) (mg/lt) |
0.0040
± 0.004 |
0.0044
± 0.002 |
0.0035
± 0.004 |
0.0029
± 0.003 |
According to Dutta & Patra, (2013) the average value of pH is 7.1
the pond seems to be of medium productive in nature for Zooplankton production.
In the present study minimum dissolved oxygen concentration was recorded in
Summer Season i.e. Pre Monsoon month 3.8 mg/lt and
maximum of 4.5 mg/l in Monsoon month (Table 1). During the study period the mean value of DO ranges from 3.8 to
4.5 mg/l. This may be due to difference in water temperature. Similar results were observed by Kamal et al. (2007). During the study period the higher values of transparency was observed during post monsoon month’s i.e. 34.51 cm and lower value was observed
during Monsoon Season 22.95 cm (Table 1). The
result supported by the findings of (Saksena et al.,
2008).
In the present
investigation alkalinity values varied from 59.54 – 65.36 mg/l during the four
seasons, of which maximum value was observed during pre monsoon month 65.36 mg/l and minimum
value was observed during monsoon month 59.54 mg/l (Table 1). Similar
result has been recorded by Elayaraj & Selvaraju, (2014). Total Hardness value ranged from 86.41 – 103.47 mg/l
in different seasons of which higher value 103.47 mg/l in Pre Monsoon and
lowest (86.41mg/l) in Post Monsoon season (Table 1). As
the water volume decreases in the pre monsoon
due to the higher rate of evaporation in
high temperature, the Hardness increases. The findings are supported by Rajagopal et al.
(2010)
During the study
period the Nitrate Nitrogen Concentration
of pond water of Purulia District varied from 0.0108
to 0.0350 mg/l. Maximum Nitrate nitrogen concentration was found in Monsoon
Season (0.0350 mg/l) and minimum value found in Winter Season (0.0108 mg/l) (Table
1). In present investigation high
values of nitrate found in monsoon season due to influx of nutrients from the
watershed areas along with runoff water in monsoon and low value in winter
season, kinetics of nitrogen cycling was low due to less decomposition of
organic matter and low water temperature. During the study
period the available phosphate concentration of the water body of Purulia District varied from 0.0029 to 0.0044 mg/l (Table 1). The highest value of available phosphate was found during the Monsoon
season and lowest value was found during winter season.
During the study period the Nitrite Nitrogen
concentration of water body of Purulia District
varies from 0.010 to 0.017 mg/l. The highest nitrite nitrogen concentration was
found in Monsoon Season and lowest concentration was found in Pre monsoon
Season (Table
1). The zooplankton study in the selected ponds of Purulia District consists of five major groups like Rotifera, Copepoda, Protozoea, Ostracoda, Cladocera represented the
zooplankton population of the studied water bodies (Table 2-5). A total 6 genus
of Rotifera group (Brachionus sp, Asplanchna sp, Keratella
sp, Synchaeta sp, Euchlanis
sp, Filinia sp) 10 genus of Copepoda
(Nauplii, Diaptomus sp, Pseudodiaptomus sp, Cyclops, Mesocyclops
sp, Paracyclops sp, Microcyclops
sp, Eucyclops, Acanthocyclops
sp, Heliodiaptomus), 3 genus of Protozoea (Amoeba,
Paramecium, Arcella) 6 genus of Cladocerans (Daphnia
sp, Ceriodaphnia, Simocephalus,
Bosmina, Moina, Diaphanosoma sp) and one genus of Ostracoda
(Cypris sp) were identified from the ponds
(Table 2). Nauplius
larvae were found in some ponds.
Rotifera
In the
present study 6 genera of Rotifera group were
identified from the water bodies of Purulia district.
The recorded population density of Rotifer was varied from 44 ind /l to 19 ind/l.
In the present investigation the maximum no of Rotifera
was found during summer season and minimum no was observed during monsoon
season due to
its preference for
warm waters. Similar findings were observed by Basawarajeshwari & Ramakrishna Reddy, (2015) and (Segers, 2003).
Cladocera
The highest concentration of Cladocerans was observed during Pre Monsoon months (80 ind/l) and minimum concentration was found during Monsoon
(42 ind/l) months. During
summer the cladoceran population was moderate due to
dense growth of rotifers and thus avoiding competition. Ramachandra Rao et al., (2008) reported that cladocerans
population was higher in summer season and lower in winter season.
Copepoda
During the study period the
seasonal density of copepod varied from 89 ind/l to 34 ind/l (Table
3). Copepods showed higher population density in summer season (89 ind/l) and lower population
density in monsoon period. This result supported by the findings of (Dar & Dar, 2009) who told that Copepod develop
better in warm periods.
Ostracoda
These are represented by Cypris sp. In the present investigation
highest concentration of Ostracoda found in 2 ind/l and lowest in 1 ind. /lt. The
population density of Ostracoda was higher in Pre
Monsoon and Post Monsoon season and lower during Monsoon season. Kedar (2008) also found the similar results.
Protozoa
In the present investigation only
three species of Protozoea are found (Amoeba, Paramecium, Arcella). The population density of Protozoa was
higher in post monsoon month and lower in monsoon month. Shivashankar &
Venkataramana, (2013), also reported that the population density of Protozoa was
also lower in Monsoon season.
Table 2. Zooplankton availability in the ponds of Purulia
District.
|
Groupwise zooplankton availability |
||||
|
Taxa |
||||
|
Rotifera |
Copepoda |
Protozoa |
Ostracoda |
Cladocera |
|
a. Brachionus sp. |
a. Nauplii |
a. Amoeba |
a. Cypris sp. |
a. Daphnia sp. |
|
b. Asplanchna sp |
b. Diaptomus sp |
b. Paramecium |
|
b. Ceriodaphnia |
|
c. Keratella sp. |
c. Pseudodiaptomus sp. |
c. Arcella |
|
c. Simocephalus |
|
d. Synchaeta sp. |
d. Cyclops |
|
|
d. Bosmina |
|
e. Euchlanis sp. |
e. Mesocyclops sp. |
|
|
e. Moina |
|
f. Filinia sp. |
f. Paracyclops sp. |
|
|
f. Diaphanosoma sp. |
|
|
g. Microcyclops sp. |
|
|
|
|
|
h. Eucyclops |
|
|
|
|
|
i. Acanthocyclops sp |
|
|
|
|
|
j. Heliodiaptomus |
|
|
|
The total no of
species recorded were 584 ind. /l, out of which Rotifera were 118 ind./l (20.21
%), Cladocera 221 ind./l
(37.84 %), Copepoda 234 ind./l
(40.07%), Ostracoda 6 ind./l
(1.03 %), and Protozoa 5 ind./l (0.86 %).
In the present
study the occurrence of season wise zooplankton
groups was dominant
in the following
increasing order. Pre
Monsoon: Copepoda > Cladocera
> Rotifera > Ostracoda
> Protozoa , Monsoon: Copepoda
> Cladocera > Rotifera
> Ostracoda > Protozoa, Post Monsoon: Copepoda > Cladocera > Rotifera > Ostracoda >
Protozoa, Winter: Cladocera > Copepoda
> Rotifera > Protozoa > Ostracoda.
Table 3. Seasonal diversity of zooplankton group in the ponds of Purulia district.
|
Seasonal
Diversity |
||||||
|
Group |
Rotifera |
Copepoda |
Protozoa |
Ostracoda |
Cladocera |
Diversity
Index |
|
Season |
Mean
± SD |
Mean
± SD |
Mean
± SD |
Mean
± SD |
Mean
± SD |
|
|
Pre Monsoon |
44 ± 5 |
89 ± 9 |
1 ± 1 |
2 ± 0 |
80 ± 21 |
1.12 |
|
Monsoon |
19 ± 2 |
64 ± 7 |
1 ± 0 |
1 ± 0 |
42 ± 14 |
1.07 |
|
Post Monsoon |
23 ± 2 |
47 ± 6 |
2 ± 1 |
2 ± 0 |
52 ± 16 |
1.17 |
|
Winter |
32 ± 3 |
34 ± 5 |
1 ± 0 |
1 ± 0 |
47 ± 15 |
1.16 |
Table 4. Composition
(%) of different group of zooplankton availability in Purulia
district.
|
Composition (%) of Different group of
Zooplankton |
|
|
Group |
Composition
(%) |
|
Rotifera |
20.21 |
|
Copepoda |
40.07 |
|
Protozoa |
0.86 |
|
Ostracoda |
1.03 |
|
Cladocera |
37.84 |
Table
5. Seasonal
Abundance (%) of different group of zooplankton in Purulia
district.
|
Seasonal
Abundance (%) of different group of Zooplankton |
|||||
|
Group |
Rotifera |
Copepoda |
Protozoa |
Ostracoda |
Cladocera |
|
Season |
Percentage
(%) |
Percentage
(%) |
Percentage
(%) |
Percentage
(%) |
Percentage
(%) |
|
Pre Monsoon |
20.37 |
41.20 |
0.46 |
0.93 |
37.04 |
|
Monsoon |
14.96 |
50.39 |
0.79 |
0.79 |
33.07 |
|
Post Monsoon |
18.25 |
37.30 |
1.59 |
1.59 |
41.27 |
|
Winter |
27.83 |
29.57 |
0.87 |
0.87 |
40.87 |
Figure 1. Graphical
representation of seasonal diversity of zooplankton group in
the ponds of Purulia district.
Figure 2. Composition (%) of zooplankton in the ponds of Purulia
district.
CONCLUSION
In the present study it depicts
that moderate no’s of zooplankton group were available in Pre Monsoon and
winter season. Minimum no’s of zooplankton group were available in Monsoon
season. This type of seasonal fluctuation may be due to the favourable
climatic condition of these seasons. Among the Rotifera
group the Brachionus sp. is more in number. It shows that the ponds are some where organically
polluted and eutrophic load is more. This is because
most the ponds are multi ownership in nature and pond water is used for various
household work and irrigation purpose also. The desired water level must be
maintained by proper desiltation of the pond and
conducting awareness programme among the villagers. If we properly aware the
local fishers then only we can restore our old perennial water body that
enhance the rich biodiversity of flora and fauna.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors are thankful to Mr. Kamalakanta Murmu, Assistant
Director of Fisheries, Purulia
for providing preliminary idea about the Fishery Resources of the Purulia District. We express our special thanks to the
fishermen associated to those villages for giving necessary support during the
sampling and field level data collection. We are thankful to the Department of
Zoology, Vidyasagar University for providing
laboratory facilities.
REFERENCES
APHA. (2008).
Greenberg, Arnold E. (Editor), Eaton, Andrew D. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater.20.1-19.
Anukool, S., & Shivani, S. (2011). Assessment of
Physico-Chemical properties and sewage pollution indicator bacteria in surface
water of River Gomti in Uttar Pradesh. International
Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2(1), 325.
Basawarajeshwari, I., & Ramakrishna Reddy, V.K. (2015). Zooplankton diversity in fresh water reservoir of Yadigir district,
Karnataka state International Journal of Current Research,4(3),137-147.
Battish, S. (1992). Freshwater Zooplankton of India: Oxford
& IBH Publishing Company.
Cox, E.J. (1996). Identification of Freshwater Diatoms from live
Material, Chapman & Hall.
chemical parameters of
Jamunabundh, Bishnupur, India. International
Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3(8),1-7.
Needham, J. G., & Needham, P. R. (1938). guide to the study of fresh water
biology. (5th ed.,
revised): San Francisco, Holden Day, Inc., 108.
Round, F. (1984). The ecology of algae. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press,1-653.
Ward, H.B., & Whipple, G.C.
(1918). Fresh Water Biology, John
Wiley & sons, Incorporated Press,1-126.
Wetzel, R.G., & Likens, G.E.
(1991). Organic matter. Limnological
Analyses, 2(6), 129-137.